From: PsyWraith@a...
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 18:07:57 -0500
Subject: (Off topic...) Gunships (was Re: needle beam thoughts)
In a message dated 96-12-03 16:24:02 EST, you write: << given the recent discussion about needle beams, I though I'd chuck in my opinion... <I'm designing my first FT fleet now, and I had an idea from an aircraft <that used to patrol the Ho Chi Mihn Trail. it was some form of cargo <craft, fitted with a whole bunch of guns firing out the left (or is it <right?) side. it would orbit any vehicles it wanted to kill, firing all <its weapons as it circled. >> The aircraft you're thinking of were the AC-series gunships. AC-47 Dragon (based on the C-47/DC-3 Dakota) with three 7.62mm miniguns, AC-119 Shadow with (I believe) two miniguns and two 20mm Vulcans, and the AC-130 Specter with (in the current AC-130U configuration) one (maybe two) 25mm gatling chaingun(s), one 40mm Bofors autocannon, and a 105mm howitzer. They're very effective at counter-insurgency operations. <I'm designing some small craft, maybe 25 tons, with 8 thrust, 2 fire <control, and as many needlebeams as I can fit all firing into the same <arc. since you only need 1 firecon to fire x needlebeams at the same <systems, I figure if I can get maybe 6 beams in, I'm guaranteed a system <kill each shot! face them all out one side so I can orbit a ship, or fly <behind a row of ships, and go along knocking out weapons as you go! <just a thought... figured it would make them more effective... This does make you vulnerable to the other sides escorts however which are as manuverable as you and carry more flexible weapons. Remember that the gunships were firing on infantry (and infantry not equiped with shoulder-fired SAMs), not other aircraft. Your gunship will run afoul of capital ships with longer-ranged weapons and your design does not allow for screens making you vulnerable to concentrated return fire. <Brian Lojeck