Odd armour developments

7 posts ยท Aug 2 2002 to Aug 4 2002

From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>

Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 02:19:10 -0400

Subject: Odd armour developments

Ryan,

Adeptus Mechanicus should have been renaimed Ineptus Mechanicus. Anyone who
couldn't build a Storm Bolter that didn't jam every few shots ought not to be
considered worthwhile in any technical way.

John A also made an excellent point about hair plus sand. Sand is bad. It's
most annoying property is its ability to find its way inside clothing and into
places it should not be. Or into seemingly closed mechanical systems (perhaps
via osmosis or teleportation). And it proceeds to be either uncomfortable or
destructive by degrees. And having it in the hair is no joy. Nor mind you is
having a huge mass of hair on your head in 35C plus humidex and having to hump
10 miles with a heavy rucksack and a full combat loadout including ammo for
the support weapons. Not like you're going to be happy in any event, but if
you've got more hair than required, you're going to be even less happy.

Ah the joys of being an infanteer (I noticed the armoured recce types always
seemed to drive if the distance was more than about 10 yards.... lazy bunch of
buggers....and the fact they liked to keep beer in the APCs wasn't lost on us
gropos either....)!

From: ShldWulf@a...

Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 03:57:13 EDT

Subject: Re: Odd armour developments

In a message dated 8/2/02 12:25:32 AM Mountain Daylight Time,
> kaladorn@magma.ca writes:

> and the fact they liked

Tried keeping it in the Tanks for more protection, (and better AC:o) but it
seems the crews kept complaining of not having any room for THEM to
ride.....

Randy:o) (Can you tell I worked and played with mech troops?:o)

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: Odd armour developments

> --- Thomas Barclay <kaladorn@magma.ca> wrote:

> having to hump 10 miles with a heavy rucksack

Keep reminding me why I want to stay mechanized.:)

Actually, I'm considering reenlisting for Ft. Lewis to check out this IBCT
concept (but my window don't open for another... year and 2 months so I've got
plenty of time to hash out whether it's that or FRG again).

From: Z. Lakel <zlakel@t...>

Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 19:42:44 -0400

Subject: Re: Odd armour developments

> Actually, I'm considering reenlisting for Ft. Lewis to

IBCT? FRG?

From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>

Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 20:37:53 -0400

Subject: Re: Odd armour developments

> At 7:42 PM -0400 8/3/02, Z. Lakel wrote:

IBCT
http://www.angelfire.com/art/enchanter/bct.html

FRG
http://www.lewis.army.mil/123in/frg/fsg.htm

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:03:11 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: Odd armour developments

> --- Ryan Gill <rmgill@mindspring.com> wrote:

Ummm... NO!

FRG = Federal Republic of Germany

As opposed to the late great DDR.

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 01:06:27 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: Odd armour developments

> --- "Z. Lakel" <zlakel@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

Intermediate Brigade Combat Team which is that
medium-weight wheeled concept that's the latest thing.

FRG is Germany.