NOT Re: New Fighter Types (drifting OT....)

3 posts ยท Jul 20 1998 to Jul 20 1998

From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>

Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 22:37:26 +0100

Subject: NOT Re: New Fighter Types (drifting OT....)

> OK, OK, already..... We've coded them GF 018. 6 per pack, UK price

Are we talking height, girth, or some other statistic that shouldn't be
mentioned on a list of this type (well, not unless we want to get back on to
the Phalon thread....);)

From: Niall Gilsenan <ngilsena@i...>

Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 23:03:26 +0100

Subject: Re: NOT Re: New Fighter Types (drifting OT....)

> At 22:37 20/07/98 +0100, you wrote:
Available NOW
> in UK, and I assume in Oz as well. No photos yet, but trust me - they

I think I'll leave it all to the imagination. Considering the average
wargamers standard configuration though you can probably guess.

I liked the THOR idea (always wanted to go down fighting TOG). To paraphrase a
certain film "Nuke him from orbit. Its the only way to be sure".

Hey look I mentioned Ortillery. Almost back on topic. How much damage could
the average wargamer survive from an Ortillery strike?

From: The cat that walks by Himself <catwalk@i...>

Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 23:28:23 +0100

Subject: Re: NOT Re: New Fighter Types (drifting OT....)

Niall Gilsenan gibbered:

> Hey look I mentioned Ortillery. Almost back on topic. How much