From: cibennett@w...
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 20:25:30 -0500
Subject: (no subject)
cibennett@worldnet.att.net subscribe
(no subject)
From: John Dattalo <jdatalo@e...>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 12:18:02 -0500
Subject: (no subject)
unsubscribe jdatalo@erinet.com
From: NeghVar@a...
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 01:23:45 -0500
Subject: Re: (no subject)
In a message dated 96-11-18 12:37:19 EST, you write:
From: Adam Delafield <A.Delafield@b...>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 03:14:14 -0500
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Date sent: 19-NOV-1996 09:13:23 > unsubscribe NeghVar@aol.com This is not the address for commands. Send all commands to;
From: Jeff Barton <jeffb@c...>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 11:53:35 -0400
Subject: (no subject)
UNSUBSCRIBE FTGZG-L
From: The J People <jpeople@f...>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 20:15:42 -0400
Subject: (no subject)
unsubscribe ftgzg-l jpeople@faraday.dialix.com
From: The J People <jpeople@f...>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 20:16:45 -0400
Subject: (no subject)
subscribe ftgzg-digest jpeople@faraday.dialix.com
From: Jonathan white <jw4@b...>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 06:16:32 -0400
Subject: Re: (no subject)
> At 10:16 AM 7/16/97 +1000, you wrote:
REVIEW and SUBSCRIBE / UNSUBSCRIBE commands go to the server address
(FTGZG-L-REQUEST@bolton.ac.uk) thank you. And I'm not 100% sure it does
Digests, I'm afraid..
TTFN
Jon
From: 97010582 <97010582@s...>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 12:41:10 +0100
Subject: Re: (no subject)
why do u need help?
From: Barry Cadwgan <bcadwgan@f...>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 06:37:14 +1100
Subject: (no subject)
unsubscribe ftgzg-l
From: Jonathan white <jw4@b...>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 08:38:15 +0000
Subject: Re: (no subject)
> At 06:37 24/11/98 +1100, you wrote:
I suppose this is a good point to remind people - you send unsubscribe
messages to
FTGZG-L-REQUEST@BOLTON.AC.UK
not the list address
TTFN
Jon
From: RICK L MOWER <MOWERR@p...>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 17:29:12 -0700
Subject: (no subject)
test
From: Warbeads@a...
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:10:47 EDT
Subject: (no subject)
_http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1453293,00.html_ (http://www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,1453293,00.html) Normally I don't go there but someone at work sent it to me. And we call "geodata" "Geospatial-Intelligence" in our line of work. To bring this on topic, does anyone know of how to represent a 'gaming vignette' in the appropriate scale (this goes to several lists) of the military using a 'black box' of some kind to represent digital maps? I still wonder how effective countermeasures would be and what would be the effect of troops used to near-real time information being denied that information. Gracias,