From: Noah Doyle <nvdoyle@m...>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:22:03 -0500
Subject: NI Ship Name
> At 05:52 PM 1/29/2004 -0800, you wrote: Keep the name. This arguement could be made for several other ship names, and it would be equally silly. It's not like we -have- a series of Atrocity-class vessels, or anything.
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 22:50:12 -0500
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
> It's not like we -have- a series of Atrocity-class vessels, or the IF Heavy BB's need names too.... <vbg>
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
> --- Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote: Fortunitely one can save time by using the U.N. peacekeeping mission names, since they are interchangable. Bye for now,
From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:23:07 +0100
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
[quoted original message omitted]
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:35:24 -0600
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
The comment has a lovely ambiguous quality to it, doesn't it? Could also be pro-UN propagit, as in the UN cleaning up atrocity sites... ;->= The_Beast owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU wrote on 01/30/2004 12:23:07 AM: > ----- Original Message -----
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:38:48 -0600
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
The comment has a lovely ambiguous quality to it, doesn't it? Could also be pro-UN propagit, as in the UN cleaning up atrocity sites... ;->= The_Beast Of course that is exactly they way I took it.......cough cough........)
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:48:24 -0600
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
> The comment has a lovely ambiguous quality to it, doesn't it? Could Hey, as the token liberal of the list, that's EXACTLY the way I took it... ;->= The_Beast PS Thank goodness this is my last graves shift; I intend to be a lot less silly in the near future... And a bit less free with the ellipses...
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 01:11:53 -0600
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
Hey, as the token liberal of the list, that's EXACTLY the way I took it... ;->= *OK, you can have it then lol. PS Thank goodness this is my last graves shift; I intend to be a lot less silly in the near future... And a bit less free with the ellipses... *Oh I've been there! Did an 8:00pm to 8:00am shift for two years.
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:59:11 +0000
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 09:22:03PM -0500, Noah V. Doyle wrote: > Keep the name. This arguement could be made for several other ship Well, the K'V probably do... R
From: Izenberg, Noam <Noam.Izenberg@j...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:13:29 -0500
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
From: "Noah V. Doyle" <nvdoyle@insightbb.com> > Keep the name. This arguement could be made for several other ship Thanks. With the discussion on the list I'm pretty confident the name is neither a faux pas, nor inappropriate, even if it has multiple connotations. Few names don't. Names are strange things. I named my very first NI mini (the first FT mini I owned, actually - won in the late great Estrell Cruiser Duels), which was a Roma BB - re-flagged and christened the Dreyfus.
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 10:13:09 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: NI Ship Name
Stir the pot, stir the pot. taste test... Needs another grain of salt! Stir the pot, stir the pot... Bye for now, John L. > --- Don M <dmaddox1@hot.rr.com> wrote: