New Superior Models Land and Space Combat Miniatures

5 posts ยท Jan 13 1998 to Jan 14 1998

From: Game Masters <bill3@s...>

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 02:22:12 -0800

Subject: New Superior Models Land and Space Combat Miniatures

For the land-combat gamers, we now carry all Entomalian Empire MAATAC
War Machines. These heavily detailed tanks are perfect for your Stargrunt or
Epic 40,000 games.

And, for the space-combat gamers, we now carry the Avarian United Worlds
Vulture-class Galactic Attack Carrier.  This Carrier is a beauty to
behold and would make a perfect addition to your Full Thrust, Silent Death, or
Starfleet Battles games.

Finally, all miniature prices have returned to their mid-1997 levels:
20% off the list price on everything! And, no shipping and handling charges
for orders over $100.

See http://www.stellargames.com

From: Steve Pugh <steve@p...>

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 11:31:35 +0000

Subject: Re: New Superior Models Land and Space Combat Miniatures

> For the land-combat gamers, we now carry all Entomalian Empire

Eh? Stargrunt - 25mm
Epic 40,000 - 6mm
These must be some very strange tanks to be 'perfect' in both!

Cheers,

From: Jonathan Jarrard <jjarrard@f...>

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 10:00:17 -0500

Subject: Re: New Superior Models Land and Space Combat Miniatures

> Steve Pugh wrote:

Actually, some of the Bug vehicles would make some fun robotic forces.

From: Brian Bell <bkb@b...>

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 18:59:54 -0800

Subject: Re: New Superior Models Land and Space Combat Miniatures

> Finally, all miniature prices have returned to their mid-1997 levels:
20% off
> the list price on everything! And, no shipping and handling charges
While I don't mind the information about the miniatures, or even the link,
PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE don't turn this list into a commerical!

From: Game Masters <bill3@s...>

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 20:39:44 -0800

Subject: Re: New Superior Models Land and Space Combat Miniatures

Correction. I meant to say that the MAATAC miniatures were perfect for
Dirtside II games.

> Jonathan Jarrard wrote: