New site?

11 posts ยท Oct 9 2000 to Oct 10 2000

From: Joe Ross <ft4breedn@h...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 05:40:23 GMT

Subject: New site?

BTW... Should there be a new site for accepted community house rules? So

that people wouldn't have to sit through the "badger other nationality"
debates? I think I'd do better there; not rain on anyone's nationality
parade... STS... Love being American ("United States' American" it would

seem), but my girl-friend is Afro-American, so I think that I should say
"go seminoles!"... in case anyone was listening...

From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>

Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:05:10 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: New site?

> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Joe Ross wrote:

> BTW... Should there be a new site for accepted community house rules?
So
> that people wouldn't have to sit through the "badger other

> parade... STS... Love being American ("United States' American" it

Don't worry too much about the off-topic nationality stuff going on
right
now - we're usually slightly more normal than this, and your usual
gaming programming will resume shortly!

Welcome to the list, by the way.

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 07:27:32 EDT

Subject: Re: New site?

On Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Brian Burger
> <yh728@victoria.tc.ca> writes:

Can we use "normal" for either adults playing with toy soldiers OR Science
Fiction types (much less both together)? <grin>

and your usual
> gaming

Ditto from Glenn, the politically unaligned (nobody will take me,)
multi-racial, multi-ethnic, evangelical Presbyterian; i.e., an "average"
(US) American who spends too much work time wishing he was assigned something
a bit closer to home then Pacific Rim nations. Or more time with wife and
kids. Or more time painting and playing minis. Or making jewelry. Or just
reading.

From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 10:40:02 -0400

Subject: Re: New site?

On Mon, 09 Oct 2000 05:40:23 GMT, "Joe Ross" <ft4breedn@hotmail.com> wrote:

> BTW... Should there be a new site for accepted community house rules?
So
> that people wouldn't have to sit through the "badger other nationality"

> debates? I think I'd do better there; not rain on anyone's nationality

There are a couple of sites with house rules, but no site where they are all
compiled. It would be interesting, but it's a lot of work, and you really need
someone to edit things. I know of 3 different sets of "overwatch" rules for
Stargrunt, including mine, for instance. Check the Full Thrus web ring,
though.

As for the nationality debate, you have to be around for a while but in fact
it's all very playful. This group isn't anti-such-and-such a
nationality. The
Ground Zero Games-East Coast Convention is going to have a US versus
Canada game. There are a lot of different nationalities on this group. We get
into some good natured ribbing, but nothing mean or anything.

I think you came in during a lull in the action. Last weekend there weren't a
lot of posts, but that was because there was a huge flurry of posts for quite
a while before. We do occasionally get into "topic slip" but the list really
isn't as bad as it seems this weekend. Take a look at the list archives, and
you'll see.

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 12:35:01 -0400

Subject: Re: New site?

> >BTW... Should there be a new site for accepted community house rules?

No but there will be shortly, for FT at least and to the best of my ability to
produce it. You might also try the FT FAQ.

> Ground Zero Games-East Coast Convention is going to have a US versus

Two, actually. According to the schedule I last heard, Tom Barclay and Los
will be running a FMA Skirmish game Saturday night. (aside to Joe and other
new listers--FMA Skirmish is in playtest right now, which is why you
haven't seen it). And some overconfident neurotic will be running a Full
Thrust battle, "First CanAm", on Sunday morning.

From: Joe Ross <ft4breedn@h...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:48:16 GMT

Subject: Re: New site?

> As for the nationality debate, you have to be around for a while but in

> fact

<snip>

Actually, I have been around for several years, off and on, but now that I am
getting up to 50 emails a day on rather off topic subjects, it gets
irritating.. I understand it is all in good fun... sorry to be a "stick in the
mud".

Anyway.. I am over it.. So to be totally hypocrital, is anyone here an MS
Access guru? I am trying
to code a database/ship creator and can't figure  a few things out.
Kinda need some help.

From: Joe Ross <ft4breedn@h...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 17:51:39 GMT

Subject: Re: New site?

<snip>
> will be running a FMA Skirmish game Saturday night. (aside to Joe and

I am NOT a new listener!! UHHH!!

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 15:34:26 EDT

Subject: Re: New site?

> Actually, I have been around for several years, off and on, but now

OT can be a problem - I have had to delete TOO many messages on religion
in the deja.recreational.miniatures.(misc or Historical) lists lately.
Jews vs. Christians vs. Atheists - the
Hindus/Buddhists/animists/agnostics/islamicists have either stayed out
or not identified their stands. I bailed out when it was clear the thread was
going NOWHERE fast.

No big deal. No hot buttons means you're dead. Everybody just has different
ones.

> Anyway.. I am over it..

Well, I just took a 8 hour 'wonder wizard' course at work on that. So, for me,
no... software looks pretty nice though. Tried teaching myself it 'on the fly'
several years ago. Tougher then it looks in some respects.

From: Channing Faunce <channing@g...>

Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 19:56:00 -0400

Subject: Re: New site?

> Chris DeBoe wrote:

> And some overconfident neurotic will be running a Full Thrust

Has any 'consensus' (yeah, right) been reached as far as set-up, how
sides will be chosen (given the fact that there will almost certainly be lots
more from Here as opposed to There), etc.

I mean, come-on, we only have 4 months to hash this out after all.

From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 22:37:03 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: New site?

> --- Chan Faunce <chanfaunce@toast.net> wrote:

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:24:08 -0400

Subject: Re: New site?

> Chris DeBoe wrote:

The rules--or a first approximation thereof--are at: