From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 22:30:41 +0000
Subject: New Battlefleet Gothic? (was Re: Full Tilt?)
> Excerpts from FT: 30-Oct-97 Re: Full Tilt? by "Mark A. Siefert"@csd.uw No of course they won't re-release the same old minis - then people would be able to play with their existing collections, and not have to buy loads of new stuff... Sorry, am I being just a little bit cynical...? ;)
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 09:45:05 -0800
Subject: Re: New Battlefleet Gothic? (was Re: Full Tilt?)
> Ground Zero Games wrote: Siefert"@csd.uw > >> I've also heard that the somewhat Evil Empire (it's not TWIMC, History is on the side of those who claim that 'The Evil Empire' is really controlled by the 'marketing department' and not by the game designers. It should be noted that in the official tourneys run by Citadel flunkies that figures must be Citadel unless "Citadel does not produce a figure of that type". Bye for now,
From: Christopher Weuve <caw@w...>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 09:50:09 -0500
Subject: Re: New Battlefleet Gothic? (was Re: Full Tilt?)
> Someone (I think Mark Seifert) wrote: > and I *really* hope GW doesn't "modernize" it's fleet the way I actually like the new Warlord. What I don't like is the price tag ($30), which is just plain obscene. If they keep up with their current plans, I don't think GW will be a vaiable force in the States for much longer. They are pricing themselves out of the market, bith among the consumers, and among the retailers, where they have a minimum order rewquirement of $600 AND two of every product. Note having retailers sellking your product may work in England, where there is a GW on every corner, but not here, where they are relatively sparse.