From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 23:39:14 +1000
Subject: Re: Naval Intelligence
> Haun, Gilles - SSG wrote: I've tracked this story to a copy of the US Naval Institute proceedings magazine dated 1920. It was old before this publication of it, almost certainly pre-1900, certainly pre-1914. An Oldie, but a Goodie!
From: Haun, Gilles, SSG <haung@E...>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 10:51:28 -0500
Subject: Naval Intelligence
Hey everyone, being on the subject of naval assets, I thought you would appreciate this bit of humor a friend of mine just e-mailed me. This is truly a gem to modern 'technology' and what happens when you think you have all of the answers. Being American military myself and having friends in the Canadian military, I can appreciate the finese involved here. Enjoy Gil ------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 23:19:04 +0000
Subject: Re: Naval Intelligence
In message <c=US%a=_%p=ORGANIZATION%l=FETC2-980113155128Z-48619@server-eustis.army. mil> > "Haun, Gilles - SSG" <haung@eustis.army.mil> wrote: > The following dialogue was released by the Chief of Naval Operations [snip] Hmm, isn't chinese whispers fun? I saw this several months ago, but in a somewhat modified form. You would have thought electronic propogation would keep thngs consistant... (it sounds like this one has been slightly exagerated - it was a single battleship first time around:)).
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 16:18:21 +1000
Subject: Re: Naval Intelligence
> Samuel Penn wrote: mil> > "Haun, Gilles - SSG" <haung@eustis.army.mil> wrote: It's a case of people "merely adding corroborative detail to add an air