Nathan's FAS designs

Frigate: TMF 23, NPV 76 (or, in other words, you've paid for 1 Mass of weapons
more than you use).

Missile Destroyer: Legal design, but the data sheet lacks 1 hull box
(should be 3/3/2/2, not 3/2/2/2).

Light cruiser: Quick check gives the cost as 179?

Escort Cruiser: Quick check gives the cost as 231?

Heavy Cruiser: Cost 281. I'm beginning to think that you only pay 6 for the
ADFC; it costs 8.

Battleship: Cost 424. Yep, it must be the ADFC.

Superdreadnought: Quick check gives TMF 254, NPV 854, 76 hull boxes rather
than the stated TMF 269, NPV 897, 72 hull boxes?

The designs look like decent all-rounders, if maybe a little
high-thrust for capitals. Now add some Interceptor squadrons to break
up enemy attack fighter stacks and/or screen your heavies against
incoming missiles <g>

Regards,

The adfc problem has been fixed as i used my own personal fleet design program
i made in excel. A escourt carrier is also beining designed and i will probley
purchase a model with fighters as soon as possible. Although if you read my
background for the FAS nation they have a very small population and really
cannot afford to replace the pilots that are killed in combat.

> Nathan wrote:

> The adfc problem has been fixed as i used my own personal fleet

OK.

> A escourt carrier is also beining designed and i will probley
background for the FAS nation they have a very small population
> and really cannot afford to replace the pilots that are killed in

There was no FAS background on the URL you sent, and the "Back" button
returned a "The page you are trying to access doesn't exist on Yahoo!
GeoCities" result.

But which do you think is more expensive (in money and manpower) to lose: a
couple dozen fighters, or one single battleship?

Regards,