From: Robert W. Eldridge <bob_eldridge@m...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:09:28 -0500
Subject: RE: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
I like STARGRUNT - ASSAULT COMPANY, but "GRAV CAV" is pretty good too. [quoted original message omitted]
From: Indy Kochte <kochte@s...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:22:24 -0500
Subject: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn 11/3/06, Robert > W. Eldridge <bob_eldridge@mindspring.com> wrote: SG:AC is fine, as is G-CAV2 (or the FMA* variants posted earlier). "Grav Cav" sounds too corny to me to take seriously. Mk
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:41:25 -0600
Subject: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
Grav Cavalry? Gravitic Cavalry?anti/null/whatever-Grav Cavalry? Isn't FMA an insurance company? Course, G-Cav 2 is fine, and you can put fluff like 'The popular press seems to think it cool to shorten it to Grav Cav, but the grunts take their cue from it's operational designation, G-Cav'. Is the whole love/hate relationship with the press too American? The_Beast Mark wrote on 11/03/2006 09:22:24 AM: > [quoted text omitted] > On 11/3/06, Robert W. Eldridge <bob_eldridge@mindspring.com> wrote:
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:29:23 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
> Course, G-Cav 2 is fine, and you can put fluff like 'The popular press I suggested Grav Cav because (IMO) "Grav" is more readily identifiable as a science fiction element than "G"; and because it's analogous with the existing usage Air Cav.
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:38:51 -0600
Subject: Re: Re: Name for rules (was: Re: Blue Sky Thinking (was: Re: [GZG] re:Wanted)
Agreed, just co-op'ting others. And, I like the press. ;->= Well, some, of late.... The_Beast Chris wrote on 11/03/2006 10:29:23 AM: > >Course, G-Cav 2 is fine, and you can put fluff like 'The