More detail added to ships...

4 posts ยท Jan 10 2002 to Jan 11 2002

From: Flak Magnet <flakmagnet@t...>

Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:50:44 -0500

Subject: More detail added to ships...

Hello all,

Thank you everyone who provided input on my first ship-building
efforts. I've found myself a brand now hobby, now all I have to do is buy FT
rules, find players (for anyone on this list, I live in the Metro Detroit
Area, Michigan, USA) and I'm all set.

I worked on the BG and MC some more last night. Anyone interested in seeing
what I accomplished can go to:

http://www.geocities.com/flakmagnet72/pics/scratchbuilt/

The old pics from yesterday are still there for comparison, but all of the new
pics are either BG2 and MC2. I consider these ships "finished" except for
cleaning up feathering from the sanding or the
bubbled plastic you'll see on MC2-Port.jpg on the hull near the bow,
below the wire.

You might note that I chopped the "tacked on" torp-tubes from the MC.
I was ambivalent when I was putting them on, and when someone mentioned that
it was a bit "overmuch" yesterday I resolved to got
with my initial plan of keeping the Y-axis profile narrow, something
the extra tubes bulked out too much.

My current project is going to two more ships to be built along the same lines
(unified look and all that) but with a 50% incread in size. In my
concept one will sport a multi-tube weapon in the bow, stubby
mine-layer/torp tubes studding the sides and possibly a few PD weapon
along it's length. The other will be a carrier type craft for fighters and
bombers to call "mothership". Each will be large enough for me to model small
tanks (storage, not combat) and tubing onto, so I'm looking forward to trying
some new techniques on them. After thas come escorts, then fighters... Then I
need to develope another "look" and build a fleet of those... wheee!

I've also found a group on Yahoo expressley for this kind of shipbuilding;

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shipmodels/

I'll likely take my exhibitionistic tendencies with my ships there after this
message. It's a more focused, therefore, more appropriate forum I think. As
this group seems to tend more towards
discussions of the political setting than modeling/playing.  (Not that
I'll be leaving this list, mind you.) However, if the members of this list
would like me to continue sharing links to pics of my latest efforts, I'll be
happy to do so. I'll wait for some response to get an unnofficial consensus.

From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <schoon@a...>

Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 13:26:05 -0800

Subject: Re: More detail added to ships...

> On 1/10/02 7:50 AM, "Flak Magnet" <flakmagnet72@yahoo.com> wrote:

> I worked on the BG and MC some more last night. Anyone interested in

Looking very much improved. One small item: the ragged edges or freshly cut
styrene can be "smoothed" by running a blade across them, perpendicular to the
surface.

From: Flak Magnet <flakmagnet@t...>

Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:58:28 -0500

Subject: Re[2]: More detail added to ships...

Yup, that's what I'm going to do. I've already used that technique. Can't hurt
to write it out though, someone else might have learned something there...

From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>

Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 21:53:55 EST

Subject: Re: More detail added to ships...

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 10:50:44 -0500 Flak Magnet <flakmagnet72@yahoo.com>
writes: <snip>
> I'll likely take my exhibitionistic tendencies with my

I love pictures. Usually i just don't publicly coment on them (Inferiority
feelings.)

Gracias,