Urm... Stupid question, I'm sure, but...
Next Monday, myself and my usual DSII partner are doing some modern
battles. No problem-there are plenty of conversions of US and USSR
stuff on various pages. Catch is that I'm borrowing his modern stuff, and all
he's got other than the Russians he's using is some British stuff. I figure
for the Challenger I'd just use the same stats as
M-1A1, not enough different at DSII level of granularity to make a
difference. The question I have is with the Brit IFV, Warrior, IIRC.
The stats given for the Bradley on this web page are as follows: M2A2 BRADLEY
(APC) MEDIUM vehicle (class 3), FAST TRACKED AMPHIBIOUS mobility, CFE power,
Armour 3 (maybe R), 1 x RFAC/1 in Turret with BASIC FireCon, 1 x GMS/L
with BASIC Guidance, 1 x APSW, Capacity for 2 Infantry Teams
Basic/Effective Signature 3 (D8) POINTS VALUE 130
What difference, if any, would there be in the stats for Warriors?
> Urm. . . Stupid question, I'm sure, but. . .
The Warrior doesn't have a GMS. Don't know what its armour level is, but I'd
guess maybe 2 rather than 3, and probably not R. The cannon is, IIRC, a
30mm (Rarden?), so RFAC-1 or 2 could be argued - maybe make it a 2 to
compensate for no GMS?
In a message dated 8/15/98 4:26:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> jon@gzero.dungeon.com writes:
<<SNIP>>
> The Warrior doesn't have a GMS. Don't know what its armour level is,
The most recent versions of the Warrior have begun to mount TOW missile
systems, one tube on each side of the turret. A write-up can be found
at:
<A
HREF="http://www.army-technology.com/projects/warrior/index.html">Army
Technology - Warrior - Tracked Armoured ...</A> (or if your browser
does not support hyperlinks
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/warrior/index.html)
In a message dated 98-08-15 00:20:10 EDT, you write:
<< Urm... Stupid question, I'm sure, but...
Next Monday, myself and my usual DSII partner are doing some modern
battles. No problem-there are plenty of conversions of US and USSR
stuff on various pages. Catch is that I'm borrowing his modern stuff, and all
he's got other than the Russians he's using is some British stuff. I figure
for the Challenger I'd just use the same stats as
M-1A1, not enough different at DSII level of granularity to make a
difference. The question I have is with the Brit IFV, Warrior, IIRC.
The stats given for the Bradley on this web page are as follows: M2A2 BRADLEY
(APC) MEDIUM vehicle (class 3), FAST TRACKED AMPHIBIOUS mobility, CFE power,
Armour 3 (maybe R), 1 x RFAC/1 in Turret with BASIC FireCon, 1 x GMS/L
with BASIC Guidance, 1 x APSW, Capacity for 2 Infantry Teams
Basic/Effective Signature 3 (D8) POINTS VALUE 130
What difference, if any, would there be in the stats for Warriors?
John M. Atkinson >>
I dont know about the warrior..but i would question the Bradley's ability to
carry the 2 Infantry teams.
Mark
> You wrote:
> I dont know about the warrior..but i would question the Bradley's
Well, the guy who's figs I'm borrowing only has enough for one base per squad
anyway.
[quoted original message omitted]