From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:32:54 +0100
Subject: Re: Mixed combat units, etc.
[quoted original message omitted]
Mixed combat units, etc.
From: Unknown Sender <@
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 00:23:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Mixed combat units, etc.
As for the scanfed, my army unit was mixed, my present one is not, but thats only from the lack of applicants...:) As for camo, we use IR blocking camo netting already, developed by Barracuda Technologies already, but the cheapest way is to apply wet branches of a tree that I don't know the english name for. It completely blocks IR signature if you put it on in a layer of about 40cm thickness. If we can do that today, what can we do in 200 years.... :) > --- "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> wrote:
From: Roger Burton West <roger@f...>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:04:55 +0000
Subject: Re: Mixed combat units, etc.
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 07:32:54AM +0100, K.H.Ranitzsch wrote: > I guess these would have female and or mixed units - a development from Erm... I tend to assume that _every_ power in the GZGVerse allows female combat troops, and that Tom's distinction was between mixed units (men and women in the same unit) and segregated ones.
From: Alan and Carmel Brain <aebrain@w...>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:45:05 +1100
Subject: Re: Mixed combat units, etc.
From: "K.H.Ranitzsch" <KH.Ranitzsch@t-online.de> > > Don't have any idea for: