From: KH.Ranitzsch@t... (K.H.Ranitzsch)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:11:43 +0100
Subject: Re: Merkavas ?
[quoted original message omitted]
Merkavas ?
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:40:48 +0100
Subject: Re: Merkavas ?
> KH wrote: > >>Some of the new satchel charges (large, tis true) are killing Two of them now. The reports read almost identically though - same unit, almost the same location, even the same number of casualties :-( Later,
From: Joe Ross <ft4breedn@h...>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 02:21:08 +0000
Subject: Re: Merkavas ?
What? 3? All crew members? what did you expect from an anti-tank (upward detonating) charge? > almost the same location, even the same number of casualties :-(
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 11:38:08 +0100
Subject: Re: Merkavas ?
> Joe Ross wrote: > What? 3? All crew members? 3. Which is not "all crew members", since the Merkava has a crew of 4 (and can also carry dismounts under armour - IIRC the second one did). Regards,
From: Joe Ross <ft4breedn@h...>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 22:08:04 +0000
Subject: Re: Merkavas ?
I thought the merkava was an auto-loader?... > From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@telia.com>
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 12:43:05 +0100
Subject: Re: Merkavas ?
> Joe Ross wrote: > I thought the merkava was an auto-loader?... Nope.