From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:19:20 -0400
Subject: Mercs and WMDs
When would Mercs be issued WMDs or use ones they had otherwise acquired? 1) When getting tried was better than getting dead 2) When no other method was available to bail them out of bad trouble 3) When the KV were on the doorstep of humanity and everything was on the line Situation #3 posits a KV advance on Earth that we are having trouble stemming. At that time, all methods of engaging the enemy heavily would be pursued. If we could increase our counterforce options by deploying WMDs to mercenary units defending human colonies, I'm quite sure we'd do it. By this time, the concern wouldn't so much be "are these guys gonna steal one and do something with it" as "is anyone gonna be around to care?". At that juncture, everyone becomes a soldier-candidate and any trained military force an asset. Any weapon one can deploy against the foe becomes an acceptable option. When it is win or die, all other choices kind of fade away. WMDs might be used by a mercenary unit who expects to be slaughtered otherwise (by a national army, colonial power, or whatever) and to whom disbanding or even jail would seem like a minor concern. And since suitcase nukes aren't too hard to come by (scarily so) and other WMDs are not impossible to construct, one has to assume there will be a 2183 black market (even moreso possibly than today). Heck, if a 17 year old kid can build a breeder reactor in his back yard.... then imagining some colony world making mustard gas and then having it fall into the wrong hands is hardly unlikely. Of course, the UN and the major powers will come down hard on private operations using WMDs (they don't like competition!). So it won't be done unless straights are desperate or the reward is so huge that one can then disappear. But ruling out the possibility definitely ignores a lot of the grey conflicts going on around the world and a lot of not widely known incidents that have already transpired.