[LST] Re: Testing for life

1 posts ยท Mar 14 2005

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 07:32:25 -0600

Subject: [LST] Re: Testing for life

> > The sheep meme really is getting out of hand, isn't it?

All I could think of was the long lists, both of offenses AND offenders that
the Narn would be carrying hither and yon...

Seriously, the 'is anybody out there?' note is not uncommon, but try to put in
something on topic, ok? Continue an ongoing thread, or bring up that crazy a**
idea with which you know no one would possibly agree. You'll add to the
content, and be more likely to get responses that also add value.

I'll leave off the whole question of topic shift; 'Testing for life' has
obviously now taken on a whole new meaning. Something on which we can all
ruminant.

Whoops, seriously, again, when I saw the 'Testing for life', I'd, at first,
thought we were going to be treated to a discussion of the whole topic of
'scanning for life signs', and what that might mean.

JUST HOW MUCH PUNCTUATION CAN I JAM INTO ONE SENTENCE?!?!?

The_Beast