[LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions

2 posts ยท Nov 17 2001 to Nov 18 2001

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:06:40 -0600

Subject: [LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions

Yves said:
***
I hope it's not the real intent of the rule or else all my troopers will need
2 riffles or more! (just kidding)
***

John said:
***
You give soldiers multiple weapons to increase versatility, not firepower.
ie., a soldier with a rifle and a buzzbomb is capable of engaging tanks OR
infantry. Not both at the same time. Shades of
freakin' Rambo, running around with an M-60 in each
hand.
***

Looks to me as if that's already been covered, John. Or, where does this
fall in the 75/25% spectrum?

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 18:44:52 -0800 (PST)

Subject: Re: [LST] Re: [SG] Firing & actions

> --- devans@uneb.edu wrote:

Maybe I'm unusually dense, or those beers are kicking my butt or something,
but I have no idea what you're talking about.