> Well, the list went down with less ntoice(sic) than I had hopped(sic)
to get
> (the trouble with volunteer staffers sometime. :)
Typos, too. ;->=
Not that we aren't grateful for the effort!
By the way, are you handling all the Berkerley lists? I noticed similar work
on another list I'm on there.
Haven't tried the web stuff yet, but have my handy password ready when I do!
The_Beast
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:09:43 -0500, Doug Evans writes:
to
> get
Trying to respond to too many emails this morning to bother with my spell
checker.
> Not that we aren't grateful for the effort!
If its run through csua.berkeley.edu, then yes. There are some lists there
that are managed by other people, but the maintenance of the list software has
been dropped into my lap.
So, while I don't directly run the other list I see you subscribed to
there, both lists are now running on the new machine/software.
I'm getting these from gzg-l-bounces NOT gzg-l
Michael Brown mwsaber@comcast.net
(707) 763-1708
(707) 344-1075
[quoted original message omitted]
> By the way, are you handling all the Berkerley(sic) lists?
Thanks for noticing this was NOT a typo. We Nebraskans often add extra
R's.
I've been known to "warsh my hands".
Of course, I am aware it's properly pronounced 'Bar-clay"'...
Seriously, just wanted to say I'm seeing these as gzg-l, so there must
be a special problem with Michael's stream.
The_Beast
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:26:47AM -0500, Doug Evans wrote:
> Seriously, just wanted to say I'm seeing these as gzg-l, so there must
The Sender: header (and the raw SMTP envelope) is now set to
gzg-l-bounces, where before it was owner-gzg-l. The actual list address
is the same. If you're sorting list messages by arbitrary header, the
best one to use is probably List-Id.
Actually, if you're in California, you know that it is properly pronounced
"Berzerkley".
--Greg
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Doug Evans wrote:
> >By the way, are you handling all the Berkerley(sic) lists?
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:46:51 -0700 (PDT), Gregory Wong writes:
It changed from 'People's Republic'? The only city I know to pass a ban on all
nuclear weapons inside the city limits.
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:40:53 +0100, Roger Burton West writes:
Yep. Lots of header's in them thar emails.
The Sender header is set to bounces so the software can automatically detect
bouncing addresses and after a while (I think 30 messages) set them to stop
getting emails. This takes a bunch of work off my plate
keeping the list clean of non-functioning email addresses.
At least my prefered email reader (mh-rmail inside emacs) appears to
grab the From: header (instead of the From header) to present to me. Of
course, I can sort of file based on any of the various headers.
As well, you will notice that there are now a raft of List-* headers
attached to the emails, in case you ever forget how to unsubscribe, want to
help someone else subscribe, look at the archives, etc.
Or the P.R.B
Michael Brown mwsaber@comcast.net
(707) 763-1708
(707) 344-1075
[quoted original message omitted]
Here is the header I received:
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu ([128.32.112.230]) by
sccrmxc23.comcast.net (sccrmxc23) with ESMTP id <20050715174632s2300b5umne>;
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:46:32
+0000
X-Originating-IP: [128.32.112.230]
Received: from scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
j6FAjGIJ034068; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:45:16 GMT
(envelope-from gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu)
Received: from ghost.wraith.com ([168.103.84.180])
by scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id
j6FAhefZ033935
for <gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu>; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:43:40
GMT
(envelope-from seidl@ghost.wraith.com)
Received: from ghost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ghost.wraith.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
j6FHhQI7028474
for <gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu>;
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:43:26 -0600 (MDT)
(envelope-from seidl@ghost.wraith.com)
Message-Id: <200507151743.j6FHhQI7028474@ghost.wraith.com>
To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [LST] Downtime Re: [GZG] Anyone there?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:40:53 BST."
<20050715164053.GA13572@firedrake.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:43:26 -0600
From: "Matthew L. Seidl" <seidl@wraith.com>
X-BeenThere: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
List-Id: gzg-l.lists.csua.berkeley.edu
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l>,
<mailto:gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/private/gzg-l>
List-Post: <mailto:gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu>
List-Help: <mailto:gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l>,
<mailto:gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
Errors-To: gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
X-NAS-Language: English
X-NAS-Bayes: #0: 0; #1: 1
X-NAS-Classification: 0
X-NAS-MessageID: 1346
X-NAS-Validation: {8D32DF8B-D3B8-4783-A0C5-FE37E2FC8659}
I think I see the change @listS. vs @list. (my cap for emphasis)
Michael Brown mwsaber@comcast.net
(707) 763-1708
(707) 344-1075
[quoted original message omitted]
> On 7/15/05, Matthew L. Seidl <seidl@wraith.com> wrote:
So, no GZG-WCC there. Gotcha.
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 20:44:44 +0200, John Atkinson writes:
I'm not sure if having a weapon there would make me want to come more or less
really. Probably more if it was hidden in a robotic sheep.
Matt Seidl follishly said:
> I'm not sure if having a weapon there would make me want to come more
You're thinking of ECC, not WCC. And it won't be a robo-sheep.
"Terminator sheep" is more the right idea.