> Eric Fialkowski wrote:
Don't forget the waste of bandwidth with mail complaining about what topics
are okay to discuss or not changing the subject field to identify what the
message is actually about. If you have a question on something just ask. You
are bound to get a response. This is a group of people who share common
interests, namely in GZG products. Sometimes we get off tangent, but the
majority of the lists messages are GZG related. If you remain on the list, I'm
sure you will find this is one great repository of information and ideas.
> +++++++++++++++
BTW, nice bowtie.
I am not a regular poster to the list but I'd like to put my two cents in. I
joined this list for Full Thrust and related topics. I do not object to other
topics being discussed as long as it is done in a reasonable, intelligent
manner. If I am not interested in the topics being discussed I just delete the
post, no problems. Most of the "off" topic subjects have been interesting and
I have followed quite a few of them. I think the powers in charge of the list
have intervened when needed. Mike J. Murtha The Adventurers Club
Date sent: 12-NOV-1996 09:00:46
> I think the powers in charge of the
Oooh. I've always wanted to be a Power. 8-)
There are two things that might be mildly interesting to the list. The
first is rather long- it is an intermediate step in the campaign game:
the system assault. This deals with trying to gather your forces and assault
the
defender, despite the problems of maintaining jump-point distances.
The other is probably much less interesting; it's another take on B5 style
beams <though purposefully set in normal FT... it would need slight adjustment
to actually work in someone's specific B5 universe in a balanced
way.>
Is anyone interested in either of these, or would it just be a waste of
bandwidth?
Yeah, Scott, certainly interested in the system assault subject. Not so keen
on the other one, but then I'm not a B5 fanatic.
What you got?
Mike Elliott
______________________________ Reply Separator
Date sent: 28-NOV-1996 09:09:41
> There are two things that might be mildly interesting to the list.
The
> first is rather long- it is an intermediate step in the campaign game:
the
> system assault. This deals with trying to gather your forces and
> Is anyone interested in either of these, or would it just be a waste of
These kinds of ideas are exactly why this list is here. Go for it.
> On Thu, 28 Nov 1996 Libald@aol.com wrote:
> There are two things that might be mildly interesting to the list.
The
> first is rather long- it is an intermediate step in the campaign game:
the
> system assault. This deals with trying to gather your forces and