From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 11:13:10 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Land Warfare Systems
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/index.html
From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 11:13:10 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Land Warfare Systems
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/index.html
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 10:06:07 +0100
Subject: Re: Land Warfare Systems
> DAWGFACE wrote: > http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/index.html While FAS has a lot of entries, not all of them are entirely accurate; for example, it lists the height of the M551 Sheridan as 12'6" - ie. 3.8 meters tall. If that figure has any basis in reality at all, it must be from ground to the top of the aerials. Because of errors like this, I consider FAS good only to give a general idea of what a system is and does. For specific data, I only rely on FAS if it proves impossible to find it elsewhere - and fortunately this doesn't happen very often. Lots of nice pictures though <g> Regards,
From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 11:36:21 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: Land Warfare Systems
I MAINLY LOOKED AT THE PIX, and disregard info that was in error if i knew it to be in error. DAWGIE
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 06:59:24 +0100
Subject: Re: Land Warfare Systems
DAWGFACE wrote (about the FAS site): > I MAINLY LOOKED AT THE PIX, and disregard info that was in error if i I've found and confirmed so many errors that I don't dare trust any of the other info given there... but yeah, the pics *are* nice :-)