From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 02:14:52 -0500
Subject: [KV] Who are the good guys?
OO said: I meant it more as in "the way the GZGverse Kra'Vak actually behave" than "what one NAC analyst actually thinks". Let's just hope that the NAC don't take too many casualties when they plan operations based on these theories... [Tomb] That depends on who you are rooting for;)
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 19:09:37 +0100
Subject: Re: [KV] Who are the good guys?
> TomB wrote: > >Let's just hope that the NAC don't take too many casualties when they > plan operations Every grunt who's been FUBARed by faulty intel...
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:55:14 -0500
Subject: Re: [KV] Who are the good guys?
> At 7:09 PM +0100 12/2/02, Oerjan Ohlson wrote: Or faulty leadership... "Those tanks probably aren't even operational any how..."
From: Brian Burger <yh728@v...>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:23:26 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [KV] Who are the good guys?
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Ryan M Gill wrote: > At 7:09 PM +0100 12/2/02, Oerjan Ohlson wrote: "That terrain is impassible to tanks..." "We'll all be home by Christmas." "We'll find Osama by next week!" OK, that last is more specific than the others, but they're all in the same vein! Infamous last words,