From: DAWGFACE47@w...
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:20:44 -0600 (CST)
Subject: KILLING TANKS
the satement about killing tanks should be ammend to read; anyone with guts and the right weaponry can kill a tank without infantry support. otherwise, they had just hunker down and let the tank go by unmolsted. the taliban cavalry charege vs tanks is a fluke event. i suspect that a detailed examination of this action will disclose that the tanks (all or most of them) had had their machine guns removed and being used elswhere. this would mean that the crew, if they remained buttoned up, would be forced to fire their AKs down the gun-tube to try for a machine effect on attackers any living horse/man team or man on foot can outrun a POWER traversing tank turret-they do not move about as fast as the turrt on an aircraft and hand cranked turrets move even slower.... if the crew unbuttons to get better fields of fire for their small arms, they lose the benefit of the tank armor and provide plenty of opportunity for the attackers to use hand grenades or improvished anti-armor weaponry. i also suspect that the tanks had only limited amounts of HE rounds, and the attack was lauched so that it provided short areas of aproach for the attackers and limited arc of fire to the tankers. how many of the tanks were mobile? the attack might have even been a complete surprise to the taliban crews. lots of things to look at here to see why this worked. dawgie, who wonders how afghan tankers and their floppy clothes are