From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:34:42 -0400
Subject: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
John Atkinson is so going to have it in for Turkey when he gets back.... http://www.msnbc.com/news/902529.asp?0cv=KB20
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:34:42 -0400
Subject: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
John Atkinson is so going to have it in for Turkey when he gets back.... http://www.msnbc.com/news/902529.asp?0cv=KB20
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:06:49 -0700
Subject: RE: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
You think he didn't have "issues" with them before? Michael Brown [quoted original message omitted]
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:49:55 -0400
Subject: RE: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
> At 9:06 AM -0700 4/22/03, Michael Brown wrote: Well, granted, but he'll be even less flattering with them. :-)
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:18:38 -0700
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
Well, granted, but he'll be even less flattering with them. :-) Not that there was ever a whole lot of love to lost in the first place....) Was joshing him heavily before his departure that ole Johnny Turk wouldn't allow the passage of the NRE through disputed and mutually claimed territory........ I was only half kidding...) http://www.msnbc.com/news/902529.asp?0cv=KB20
From: DOCAgren@a...
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:48:58 EDT
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
In a message dated 4/23/03 2:01:41 AM, > owner-gzg-digest@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU writes: << Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:18:38 -0700 From: "Don Maddox" <dmaddox1@hot.rr.com> Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys.... Well, granted, but he'll be even less flattering with them. :-) Not that there was ever a whole lot of love to lost in the first place....) Was joshing him heavily before his departure that ole Johnny Turk wouldn't allow the passage of the NRE through disputed and mutually claimed territory........ I was only half kidding...) http://www.msnbc.com/news/902529.asp?0cv=KB20 >> So wait... You are saying that it John Fault they couldn't go thur!!! Damm I know he can piss off some people, but a whole government... :-P
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:03:28 -0700
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
So wait... You are saying that it John Fault they couldn't go thur!!! Damm I know he can piss off some people, but a whole government... :-P Why say it's only a mere government....there is an entire religion that has him posted as "Most Wanted" lol.
From: Imre A. Szabo <ias@s...>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:48:51 -0400
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
> You are saying that it John Fault they couldn't go thur!!! Damm I WHAT!!! Does this mean that I'm no longer at the top of his "IT" list??? Well I'll just have to do something to straighten this out and get things back in there proper order... I don't suppose one of you would be kind enough to tell him that while this whole Iraq War was going on that I was busy consorting with the enemy. No, not the Iraqi's; but rather a charming French girl...
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:08:57 -0700
Subject: RE: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
Just be careful someone doesn't shave her head... Michael Brown [quoted original message omitted]
From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2003 23:19:00 -0700
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
WHAT!!! Does this mean that I'm no longer at the top of his "IT" list??? Well I'll just have to do something to straighten this out and get things back in there proper order... I don't suppose one of you would be kind enough to tell him that while this whole Iraq War was going on that I was busy consorting with the enemy. No, not the Iraqi's; but rather a charming French girl... ias Well depends on what the enemy looks like... You'll get a pass...)
From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 02:50:32 PDT
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 22:48:51 -0400 "Imre A. Szabo" <ias@sprintmail.com> writes: > You are saying that it John Fault they couldn't go thur!!! Damm I What and ruin your fun? <grin?> Gracias,
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:59:32 -0400
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
> WHAT!!! Does this mean that I'm no longer at the top of his "IT" list??? Well I'll just have to do something to straighten this out and get things back in there proper order... I don't suppose one of you would be kind enough to tell him that while this whole Iraq War was going on that I was busy consorting with the enemy. No, not the Iraqi's; but rather a charming French girl... Mention that you've realized the justice of the French point of view, have converted from the Orthodox faith to Islam, just got hired as Sen Clinton's staff and are angling to get on an arts & culture mission to Paris, Istanbul and Cairo as an exchange student from Berkeley. And are glad the "No War Four" wasn't exposed to combat. But do it off list, from Sri Lanka.
From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 06:55:35 -0700
Subject: RE: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
What do you have against Sri Lanka? Or is it about the same size as Carter Island? Michael Brown [quoted original message omitted]
From: Ryan Gill <rmgill@m...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:37:12 -0400
Subject: RE: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
> At 9:08 PM -0700 4/27/03, Michael Brown wrote: Ya never know as some people go for that look now days. And some women look good that way too. Sans all the rough cuts and such from the forced procedure..
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:55:58 -0400
Subject: RE: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
> What do you have against Sri Lanka? Or is it about the same size as John isn't likely to travel there--I'd first thought of Madagascar but I know the US military has provided advisers there recently.
From: Michael Llaneza <maserati@e...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:40:26 -0700
Subject: Re: John Atkinson and Turkeys....
I'd say Sri Lanka is dangerously close to the route at least some US ships will be taking to home port. Northern Kamchatka sounds safe. We haven't had a military presence there (above water anyway) in 80+ years. > laserlight@quixnet.net wrote: > What do you have against Sri Lanka? Or is it about the same size as