ISO: Conversions for SG2

> On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:46:25PM -0500, Barclay, Tom wrote:

This one's tough. The TWC limited the equipment the MMC could
take on-planet to what could be produced locally. Thus you had them
fighting tank battles against the Freiheimers, with muskets on one planet, and
with spears and bows on a different planet.

But... I think they would always be highly motivated, and at the least be
veterans. Green MMC units get blooded fast, so while they do occur, they'd be
rare. Leader quality would be as variable as with any other force.

Of course, you'd never have to worry about how to play the Ninjas, since they
didn't exist.

--
crawford@iac.net

Thursday 14 Dec 2000: No Sasquatch sightings occured.
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:28 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
        by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA06730;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:42:26 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBFMbtu31657;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 15 Dec
2000 14:37:53 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBFMbqk31636
        for gzg-l-outgoing; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:bV2xaJidqhX0vlOXDuRVVsZ5CWW3bdVY@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBFMbpP31631
        for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:37:51
-0800 (PST)
Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240])
        by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBFMbpf50916
        for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:37:51 -0800
(PST)
        (envelope-from s_schoon@pacbell.net)
Received: from [63.201.231.151] by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail
Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id
<0G5M003ERRUGJT@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for
 gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:33:02 -0800
From: Sean Bayan Schoonmaker <s_schoon@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [FT] New Weapon
In-reply-to: <2fd3722d4a.Charles@cableol.co.uk>
X-Sender: s_schoon@postoffice.pacbell.net
To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Message-id: <p04320408b6604c61f69b@[63.201.231.151]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
References: <p04320403b65ec3fdbc40@[63.202.81.117]>
<2fd3722d4a.Charles@cableol.co.uk>
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008c5

> how about the converse - damage increases with range, while accuracy

Easy enough to do. Flipping the tables shouldn't affect play balance. The
statistics remain the same, though reversed.

Schoon
From - Fri Dec 22 21:59:29 2000
Return-Path: <owner-gzg-l@scotch.csua.berkeley.edu>
Received: from scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (scotch.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.51])
        by lilac.propagation.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA10570;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:02:59 -0600
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id
eBFMxmb32031;
        Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:59:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 15 Dec
2000 14:59:34 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBFMxXZ32009
        for gzg-l-outgoing; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:59:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu
(IDENT:AZ4bHTaRpNJ5l3x1N8+cOKfrST+49db+@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
[128.32.43.52])
        by scotch.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id
eBFMxVP32004
        for <gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:59:31
-0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu02.email.msn.com
[207.46.181.18])
        by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id
eBFMxTf54568
        for <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:59:30 -0800
(PST)
        (envelope-from Nathan_at_Spring_Grove_UK@email.msn.com)
Received: from natlair - 62.188.17.26 by email.msn.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC;
         Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:59:22 -0800
Message-ID: <006901c066ea$aaa38f00$6d97bc3e@natlair>
From: "Nathan" <Nathan_at_Spring_Grove_UK@email.msn.com>
To: <gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: New Weapon
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 22:59:21 -0000
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Sender: owner-gzg-l@lists.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU
Reply-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Delivered-To: gzg-l@csua.berkeley.edu
Status:
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-UIDL: 39d245de000008c6

From: Peter Mancini <peter_mancini@msn.com>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2000 07:28
Subject: Re: New Weapon

> The FSE would far sooner call it the FFBA

> Don't you mean, "Je suis petit"? Unless of

My phrasing is probably missing all sorts of weird characters and not
inconceivably a few letters, but I gather that the original translation was "I
farted".

This was originally discovered by the telecommunications company of the same
name who opened a subsidiary in France without checking their brand. Oops.

Nathan