http://www.et3.com/intro.htm
Evacuated Tube Transport. It seems we have the technology.... I'm interested
to see who acts first to build this....
T.
G'day,
> http://www.et3.com/intro.htm
The requested URL could not be retrieved, but I get an "unable to determine IP
address from host name", is it just me or was there a typo?
Cheers
> Beth.Fulton@csiro.au wrote:
> http://www.et3.com/intro.htm
> The requested URL could not be retrieved, but I get an "unable to
The URL is good, but it's on Slashdot's front page at the moment, so perhaps
they're just suffering from extreme load.
I did make it to the site with no problems.
Aimee
[quoted original message omitted]
G'day,
> I did make it to the site with no problems.
Guess it could be our proxy server then, I'll have to give it a go from home
instead.
Cheers
It didn't work for me earlier, DNS issues. It's workiing now.
Roger Books
On 3-Nov-02 at 17:24, Beth.Fulton@csiro.au (Beth.Fulton@csiro.au)
wrote:
> G'day,
In a message dated 11/3/02 1:20:53 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> kaladorn@magma.ca writes:
> Evacuated Tube Transport. It seems we have the technology.... I'm
Having purused this site before, I'd have to say I'd be surprised ANYONE
would build one considering the cost and technical difficulty. I'd consider a
more "practical" mass transit system along these lines:
> http://www.aeromobile.com/aeroduct1.htm
Randy
> At 3:14 AM -0500 11/5/02, ShldWulf@aol.com wrote:
I'm curious to see how switches work between two lines. Still, it could be a
good colony level mass transit for covering long distances with very cheap
local materials.
Ryan Gill schrieb:
> At 3:14 AM -0500 11/5/02, ShldWulf@aol.com wrote:
I seriously doubt that building a continent-wide network of vacuum
tunnels is cheaper than building a set of airports.
Plus, air traffic patterns are much more flexible than those tied to a fixed
network.
Greetings Karl Heinz
> KHR wrote:
> I seriously doubt that building a continent-wide network of vacuum
Plus, the authors appear to equate "terrorists" with "hijackers who want to
survive the deed" and don't seem to consider people who just want to create a
massacre. These vacuum tubes and the capsules travelling in them are quite
sensitive to anything capable of rupturing the tubes... suddenly
running into normal-atmosphere-pressure gas when you're travelling at
4000 mph is not a good idea at all, and running into minor debris is even
worse. And no matter what the authors claim, I find it very difficult to
believe
that a continent-spanning net of tubes on the ground is easier to guard
from wrong-doers than, say, a large number of airports...
Plus, I seriously doubt that an extremely extensive system of electromagnetic
linear accelerators, airlocks, vacuum pumps etc. is that
much less vulnerable to mechanical failure (or, for that matter, that much
cheaper to maintain) than our current road and railway nets :-/
Later,
In a message dated 11/5/2002 8:21:41 AM Mountain Standard Time,
> rmgill@mindspring.com writes:
> I'm curious to see how switches work between two lines. Still, it
Not so cheap or easy to build, (the vacum one anyway:o) The other...
Randy