From: Inire <inire@y...>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: IF stats? was: 3-row hull costs
> --- Laserlight <laserlight@quixnet.net> wrote: (Or, > if you have Islamic Fed, you're heavily out-hulled). hello all! there are semi-official IF stats to be seen? whereabouts?
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:41:01 -0400
Subject: RE: IF stats? was: 3-row hull costs
> there are semi-official IF stats to be seen? whereabouts? John Lambshead published some, don't recall where to find them. Mine are at http://home.quixnet.net/~deboe/ft/ifships_revised.htm and have gotten some good feedback from the two other people who I know have played them (one being Janneke Fulton, the other someone at ECC last year--the Interupted Negotiations scenario)
From: Matt Tope <mptope@o...>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:06:35 +0100
Subject: RE: IF stats? was: 3-row hull costs
> Laserlight wrote: > John Lambshead published some, don't recall where to find them. Mine Make that 2.5 people. I use a modified Hattin (sorry if I mispelt that) CH, with 20 hull(4 rows)/8 armour, no screen, 1ADFC, 6PDS, 2 4arc class 3 beams, and 3 class 2 beams (2 three arc, 1 six arc), that works a treat (the design I used originally was much closer to the missile armed Hattin, but I needed increased direct fire weaponry to deal with 50-200 boarding pods that the enemy throw at fleet the CH is part of!). Sorry not to mention this sooner Laserlight, but the mass 84 design of yours is a real beauty to adapt to various different roles quickly and easily. Regards,
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 18:59:22 -0400
Subject: Re: IF stats? was: 3-row hull costs
> From: "Matt Tope" <mptope@omnihybrid.com> Thanks! I'll frame this and hand it on the wall...