From: Scott Clinton <grumbling_grognard@h...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:43:33 -0600
Subject: How much does FTL travel cost?
> Remember the assumption that it it costs a lot to send to send an empty > starship somewhere. The other assumption is that even full I am not sure I accept this assumption, and I 'think' I have heard others state just the opposite in this discussion (i.e. they were assuming that FTL travel was cheap). Frankly, I figured it was somewhere in between. ;-) > Steam engines are not low tech, and they are still state-of-the-art for In 150+ years they will be very low tech IMHO and steam engines are not used much today (in first world countries they are used in a few speciallized applications, yes, but that is it). > You want to send appropriate technology for the expected conditions. Here I agree with you 100%. I think it just comes down to how expensive FTL travel is. IMHO, if it is as expensive I think you suggest, then I am not sure that interstellar conflicts would be worth gaming. Empires would spend years preparing and IF the conflict ever took place they would be resolved pretty quickly (in comparison to the prep time). And I say IF they were resolved because if you knew you were out-numbered and likely to loose an impending conflict you would settle at the last minute if at all possible. Anyway, IMHO for FT, DS2 and SG2 to be viable FTL travel must be affordable to the extent that any reasonably placed colony can expect a ship from home every year at the minimum.