From: Thomas Barclay <Thomas.Barclay@s...>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 20:22:07 -0500
Subject: Re:How do others see FCT/NAC/NSL relating (was Re: Locations of
Los spake thusly upon matters weighty: > Glover, Owen wrote: To address Owen's point: Someone wrote some units up (or at least suggested) things like "The King's Own Memphis Rifles". I liked the sound of units like that - they probably have both an operational designation and a Regimental Name. I suspect, based on the fact the UK and Canada came to the aid of a shattered USA, that the formations would tend to reflect British/Canadian configuration (they'd have had more influence in the early days of the amalgamated country). But experience and time (and political necessity to co-opt former US leadership and military) will have necessitated taking the best from both worlds. It seems to me that the British naval model (with tradition involving Nelson, Hornblower, Churchill and many others) will be as likely to predominate the NAC combined fleet as any. Like Los, I think the Spec Ops community will (as they do today) steal good ideas from each other in a profligate manner. The Army will probably be organized into Corps, Divisions, Battalions, Companies, and Platoons, with the presence Regiments (as someone pointed out, these are more administrative and philosophical than combat-formations these days) and Combat Teams or Task Forces (representing forces smaller than a Division deployed to a trouble spot). As for the air force/navy thing.... I think the Navy will be better represented in FT because the FT style of combat has more to do with ship warfare than modern day air warfare. The air force may well be limited to planetary defence forces and air support for the ground pounders - and it may well follow a more RAF/RCAF model. Perhaps one last heretical thought: Why does everyone have so much trouble envisioning a state which has contributions from the UK and the USA but isn't quite like either but shows the influence of both? Guys.... we already have one!..... Some of us live there..... we call it CANADA. And since we were involved in the bail-out of the USA, it may well be that people might have used Canada as a model for how to integrate some of the diverse aspects of the two situations. Tom. /************************************************