From: Mike.Elliott@b...
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:05:06 +0100
Subject: Historical Basis for FT/DS/SG Forces (was Re: SV: X to GZG conversions)
No, don't apologise, I like the idea of using a historical force as the basis for an SF army/fleet. Anyone get any other similar ideas? How about the Wars of the Roses? Knights, Longbows, Bills, lots of minor states siding with one or other of the major powers to decide the succession to the imperial galactic throne....
From: Jonathan white <jw4@b...>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:13:53 +0100
Subject: Re: Historical Basis for FT/DS/SG Forces (was Re: SV: X to GZG conversions)
> At 13:05 29/04/98 +0100, you wrote:
TTFN
Jon
From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 1998 21:42:07 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Historical Basis for FT/DS/SG Forces (was Re: SV: X to GZG conversions)
> You wrote: > How about the Wars of the Roses? Knights, Longbows, Bills, lots of Obviously-- Knights: Wars of Roses knights dismounted often. Power-armored infantry in IFVs Bills: Line infantry with a lot of ATGM teams.
From: Allan Goodall <agoodall@a...>
Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 02:37:19 GMT
Subject: Re: Historical Basis for FT/DS/SG Forces (was Re: SV: X to GZG conversions)
> On Wed, 29 Apr 1998 13:05:06 +0100, Mike.Elliott@bull.co.uk wrote: > No, don't apologise, I like the idea of using a historical force as the I set my FT PBEM game in a universe based on the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905. The nations were the Tsarist Empire and the Nipponese Shogunate.