From: jason standlea <freke_ravenshammer@y...>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:12:46 -0800 (PST)
Subject: hey all, just a quick question on area defense fire control.....
Whats the purpose of having two of these on the same ship? Just redundancy or is there a bit in the rules I keep missing that says you canonly engage one extra 'target' per area control?
From: Oerjan Ohlson <oerjan.ohlson@t...>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:48:44 +0100
Subject: Re: hey all, just a quick question on area defense fire control.....
> Jason wrote: > Whats the purpose of having two of these on the same ship? Just As Brendan already confirmed, it is the latter. Key words emphasised: "One ADFC allows the ship's PDS (any number of them) to fire at any combination of threats (Fighters, SMBs etc.) that are directly attacking ONE OTHER SHIP that is within 6" of the ADFC-carrying ship. ..." Regards,
From: Warbeads@a...
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:55:22 EST
Subject: Re: hey all, just a quick question on area defense fire control.....
In a message dated 12/14/04 10:47:01 AM Pacific Standard Time, > oerjan.ohlson@telia.com writes: <snip> Oerjan (who has finally gotten the phone/modem line reconnected after a serious operating company SNAFU... the company which owns the physical phone lines to my apartment is a different one than the one that administers the phone calls, and those two companies appearently do not speak to one another <sigh>) oerjan.ohlson@telia.com "Life is like a sewer. What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it." -Hen3ry <Chuckle> Sounds like interagency dealings at work... My sympathy with your battle with TWO bureaucracies * but it appears "you" finally won. Gracias,