From: Evyn MacDude <infojunky@c...>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:49:47 +0100
Subject: [GZG] Wcc and Sheep.
> Laserlight wrote: > Matt Seidl follishly said: Hey if we can fly a WCC2 then there will be sheep.
From: Evyn MacDude <infojunky@c...>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:49:47 +0100
Subject: [GZG] Wcc and Sheep.
> Laserlight wrote: > Matt Seidl follishly said: Hey if we can fly a WCC2 then there will be sheep.
From: Evyn MacDude <infojunky@c...>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:19:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Wcc and Sheep.
> John Leary wrote: > The interisting history of the WCC numbers; So maybe we need to letter them if we want it to fly? WCC A?
From: John Leary <john_t_leary@y...>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Wcc and Sheep.
The interisting history of the WCC numbers; First: There was WCCI, By John F. and John L. Second: There was WCCI, by another. Third: There was WCCII, I believe this fell apart. Fourth: There was WCCII, by another. So using WCCII is correct, to continue the tradition of using the same number twice for each WCC con. Bye for now, John L. > --- Infojunky <infojunky@ceecom.net> wrote: > Laserlight wrote: http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l > [quoted text omitted]