From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:41:08 +1100
Subject: [GZG] [SG] For realism a mix is best
G'day guys, This just cropped up in my weekly literature search (see bottom of post), thought it may generate some interest here (or maybe its old news). I know I have 3 different squad configs (standard line, PA and mortar-based), but by the sounds I'm doing it all wrong. Anyone gone more diversified? Beth > ARTICLE ABSTRACT <<<< An analysis of combined arms teaming for the Australian defence force Authors: Wheeler, S Source: JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, eFIRST date: 10 FEB 2006 Language: English Document Type: Article Abstract: This study presents a quantitative analysis of combined arms teams consisting of three stages. First, an agent-based model of two generic combined arms teams is used to study the relationships between six key attributes of combined arms teams: communication, detection, lethality, mobility, protection and sustainment. Second, a genetic algorithm is applied to evolve strategies for combined arms teams against a static opposing force. Finally, a two-population genetic algorithm is used to coevolve two forces against each other. Games theory is used to analyse the results and to provide advice on the impact of adding, removing and replacing assets or capabilities within the teams. We conclude that diversity and specialization within combined arms teams is essential. Furthermore, no single combined arms team is sufficient to ensure a tactical victory on the battlefield against all potential opponents. A range of different options for constructing combined arms teams is required. Journal of the Operational Research Society advance online publication, 23 November 2005 doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602104