From: Hugh Fisher <laranzu@o...>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:06:41 +1100
Subject: [GZG] RE: Space minefields
> Now after rambling on so long, basically my question boils down to. For From attending a couple of talks, the big thing with the sensor node communication links is saving the batteries. Makes sense when you're working with the budgets given to university science departments, but I'm not so sure about minefields. Not only do the military get to spend more money, but a mine has to carry a huge energy source on board to be able to damage enemy ships. With the thrusters/ fragmentation explosives/nuclear pumped lasers already present, there seems to me less need to save on communications traffic. Stealth would be a good reason though. Were you thinking of just activation, or some kind of emergent behaviour? On a related matter, I've been jotting down notes for a computer program tentatively named "FT Swarm" which would have a human player with one warship against a horde of tiny (mass 2 to 5) robotic USVs. Would anyone else find this occasionally interesting, either as the human captain swatting the metallic swarms, or would be Skynet programmers designing new algorithms to end the biological nuisance? cheers,