[GZG] Re: Re: Re: [FT] NAC campaign setup

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lHi Nyrath,

That would be a most wonderful solution, thank you very much.

It's great to see that there is still so much interest in the maps you have
done, that the opportunity of an update has generated such a discussion. Hope
you have some quiet time coming up to be able to get it all done.:)

For my campaign, I've drawn heavily upon Indy's fleet lists for the ESU
forces of the Trans-Vega Sector (basically Mu and Eta Cassiopeiae, Wolf
46 and BD+56'2966 - the latter is more of a waystation on the long haul
back to Vega), though the Konstantin Class CVA stationed at Wolf 46 is
now in dry-dock for at least a year due to a major engine refit and has
been replaced on the active duty roster by two CVLs.

Admiral Anna Koslova, aboard SDN15 VKK Sevastyanov, has just arrived at
Eta Cassiopeia to take command of the Trans-Vega Sector, while 1st
Captain Teodor Andreyev, CH273 VKK Petropavlovsk, and Destroyer Flotilla 51
are holding the line against the Triangulii Separatists in the
BD+63'238 system.  Admiral Koslova has ordered the formation of a Task
Force to take out the Separatists once and for all. I had envisioned a
climatic clash with an FSE Task Force in the D. Triangulii system, but we may
have an Islamic Federation incursion to contend with as well.

Darn, I'll just have to get those IF ships I've been eyeing up!

Regards

David

> OK, here's the deal:

> The FSE is at the upper left of the map, in orange,

> Down at the middle bottom of the map is the red ESU, with

> Don't worry about BD+74*1047, it only leads to the

> LTT 12827 is nearby to the left, in the middle of the

> I am going to add three lines:
[1] One from your separatists at Delta Trianguli, weaving
in and out til it reaches LTT 12827.
[2] One from BD+63*238 to LTT 12827
[3] One from Wolf 46 to BD+74*456

> This should make LTT 12827 a major road block for

> Does this meet with your satisfaction?