[GZG] RE: Re: Re: FMA at EEC [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

4 posts ยท Mar 2 2007 to Mar 6 2007

From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>

Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 15:52:34 +1100

Subject: [GZG] RE: Re: Re: FMA at EEC [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Almost anything involving both nukes and lawyers...

Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email.
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4.
Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications
and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages.
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 22:02:44 +1100

Subject: RE: [GZG] RE: Re: Re: FMA at EEC [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

G'day,

> Almost anything involving both nukes and lawyers...

I can feel bureaucrats in the next Daleks game....;)

From: Mike Stanczyk <stanczyk@p...>

Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:42:39 -0700 (MST)

Subject: RE: [GZG] RE: Re: Re: FMA at EEC [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 Beth.Fulton@csiro.au wrote:

> Almost anything involving both nukes and lawyers...

Dalek Lawyers? Ewww...

Dalek bureaucrats? Contradiction in terms, I think.

From: Beth Fulton <beth.fulton@m...>

Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:50:18 +1100

Subject: RE: [GZG] RE: Re: Re: FMA at EEC [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

G'day,

> Dalek Lawyers? Ewww...

I meant as targets err opponent's troops, my beloved Daleks are staying
bureaucrat and lawyer free!;)