From: Michael Blair <amfortas@h...>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:36:24 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [GZG] Re: NSL Ships - Names & SDN
Sorry, I was just thinking that the NSL ships tended to be quite slow so naming them for runners seemed inappropriate because of this lack of speed and dong so ironically would be more of a British (NAC) thing  so you might have an NAC oilier [1] named for Sebastian Coe, something slow and ungainly as opposed to something fast and nippy. The notes for the new NSL SDN look rather jolly so far. What I find particularly interesting is the idea of the KraÂVak war influencing human ship designs, not incorporating new technology (a few new tech toys excepted but no alien tech) but evolving to meet a very different threat  well maybe not so different for the NSL, it is faster than you and is throwing a lot of kinetic energy your way albeit from a mass driver rather than as a missile [2]. Michael Notes 1. A big tanker would be slow but a replenishment ship would have to be able to keep up with the ships she served  one for a CruRon might be quite fast. It all depends on itÂs roll and on doctrine. 2. The missiles in FT. Is there any official call on what the warheads are? I had always casually and thoughtlessly assumed nukes, possibly with lasing rods to allow them to produce gamma ray lasers but I suppose they could use KE penetrators (steerable submunitions?)  maybe even like old style BB shells that have to penetrated then explode. I am assuming that anything but a contact detonation with chemical explosives would be pretty useless in space as there is no air to carry a shock wave. It is by my order and for the good of the state that the bearer of this has done what he has done. - Richelieu