From: Glenn M Wilson <triphibious@j...>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:50:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 28
_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI can think of several times that the 'high flying bird' image for cartography was used to confirm an Intelligence issue but you'd have to take my word on it. But that's still not geosynchronous... and I won't go there about resolution now, much less in the future. gzg-l-request@lists.csua.berkeley.edu wrote: <snip> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:27:57 -0800 From: Tony Christney Subject: Re: [GZG] Re: Gzg-l Digest, Vol 11, Issue 26 To: gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu Message-ID: <2546637c0243abd03c32ce68ea1d36e8@telus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Definitely not talking about geosynchronous satellites. Their orbits are much too high to be effective at surveillance, i.e. sub 2 meter photography. Tony C. > On 8-Mar-06, at 2:19 PM, Glenn Wilson wrote: > UAVs and satellites fulfill different functions. Also, are we talking > geosynchronous (spelling) satellites?