[GZG] RE: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

2 posts ยท Oct 31 2006 to Nov 1 2006

From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 09:36:09 +1100

Subject: [GZG] RE: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

As stinger nodes follow the beam die mechanic, they should be able to. This is
one of the cases where those optimised Sa'vasku designs will suffer from the
lack of extra pds.

Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----

IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email.
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4.
Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications
and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages.
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.

From: John Tailby <john_tailby@x...>

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 19:37:23 +1300

Subject: Re: [GZG] RE: [FT] Unified Fighter Rules? [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

[quoted original message omitted]