From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 11:18:34 +1000
Subject: RE: [GZG]Habitablesolarsystems [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I have to agree that permanent *sustainable* societies are extremely unlikely in the timeframe allowed. For uninhabitable systems, it seems quite reasonable that many systems would have some sort of "prospecting/refeuling" base to support wildcatters and S&R (probably a couple of hundred permanent residents). Many would be government sponsored (for military refeuling) or simply to discourage pirate bases. For extremely poor or marginal systems, these bases may have been abandoned or sold to private concerns (or even blasted to space dust by the departing government). Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/ > -----Original Message----- IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses. 2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email. 3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages. 5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe emails of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.