From: Robert N Bryett <rbryett@g...>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 09:36:28 +1000
Subject: [GZG] Gas turbine efficiency. (Was: Scale Creep)
Gas turbines are notoriously fuel-inefficient, but that's not the only consideration in the choice of power-plant. Gas turbines are mechanically simple, can be brought quickly up to full power from cold, and typically have high power-to-weight and power-to-size ratios. Presumably it was those features that attracted the designers of the M-1 Abrams. From a fuel-economy point of view, something like the turbo-compound Napier Nomad diesel turbine would be ideal as a tank engine, but keeping so complex a power-plant running in the field might present a difficult challenge. An ordinary turbo-diesel might well be a better compromise. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo-compound_engine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Nomad Essentially the crucial problem with gas-turbine engines, from an efficiency point of view, is that they throw too much energy away in their hot exhaust (creating incidentally a large infra-red signature). "Combined Cycle" gas turbine systems use heat exchangers to capture some of this wasted energy to drive steam-turbines, and can achieve very high efficiencies. However, such systems are bulky, complex, and have so far only really been used in fixed electricity- generation applications. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combined_cycle