[GZG] [FT]ParticleCannon [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Easier mechanic:  "Particle Cannon roll beam die with +1 per die
(no-rerolls) [as per attack fighters].  This means that they cannot
penetrate through armour."

Your costing for this feels right at 4 NPV/Mass with standard beam
masses.

Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

> -----Original Message-----

IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email.
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4.
Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications
and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages.
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn 08/06/06,
> Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@dva.gov.au> wrote:

A nice and simple approach. I'm just a little concerned, as per Roger's post,
this would still make them a little too effective vs screens (though less
effective than in the original proposal at least). I wouldn't like anyone to
think that I'm out to create another weapon which renders screens
completely pointless ;-).

Thanks for commenting Brendan, it is appreciated.

Cheers,

Matt