[GZG] [FT] NAC Majestic/A class

I have in my notes some mention of the NAC Majestic/A class.
This variant of the Majectic battlecruiser gets rid of the SMS and adds more
beam weaponry. But I don't have the SDS, nor do I remember where I even found
this variant. Can someone
point me to the Majestic/A variant?

Thanks.

--Greg

That sounds like a pretty common idea for a Majestic variant, but I don't know
where it's found.

> -----Original Message-----

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lIs it not in the
fluff paragraph in FB1?

Mk

> On 1/30/06, McCarthy, Tom (xwave) <Tom.McCarthy@xwave.com> wrote:

That's what I thought, but, no. The fluff just contrasts the Majestic BC with
the Victoria BB, which has no SM's.

Sorry to be no further help, but when I've got a minute later, I'll try a
search of the list archives.

The_Beast

gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu wrote on 02/28/2006 06:59:38 AM:

> Is it not in the fluff paragraph in FB1?

> On 1/30/06, McCarthy, Tom (xwave) <Tom.McCarthy@xwave.com> wrote:

Here's a couple of possibles...

http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/199911/msg00770.html

http://lists.firedrake.org/gzg/199901/msg01168.html
See Ship Design Notes.

Neither are sounding like what you are seeking, though.

The_Beast

I saw those. They weren't what I was looking for. I ended up making a new
Majestic
class myself and called it the Majestic/B class.

--Greg

> On Feb 28, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Doug Evans wrote:

> Here's a couple of possibles...

*ahem* I did TRY to help; any thought of sharing your design? I'll understand
if the fear of the fearsome power of OA's gaze causes
hesitation. ;->=

I will admit, I could have SWORN I saw a Majestic/A SOMEWHERE. Even that
I'd played against it.

That'll chew at me a bit...

The_Beast

gzg-l-bounces@lists.csua.berkeley.edu wrote on 03/01/2006 08:41:38 AM:

> I saw those. They weren't what I was looking

Here's my NAC Majestic/B class battlecruiser which removes the SML
system and makes her more NAC-like.  I used one of those ship
design spreadsheets I downloaded from somewhere. Hopefully, I got it right.

Remove the SML system and the all-arc class-2 beam.

Replace with 2x P-torp (forward arc only) and
2x class-2 beam with forward-port/forward/forward-starboard arcs each.

The mass remains at 106 and point value remains at 358.

--Greg

> On Mar 1, 2006, at 7:15 AM, Doug Evans wrote:

> *ahem* I did TRY to help; any thought of sharing your design? I'll