[GZG] [FT} Cloaked ships & Fighters

3 posts ยท Jul 27 2007 to Jul 28 2007

From: DOCAgren@a...

Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:21:14 EDT

Subject: [GZG] [FT} Cloaked ships & Fighters

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lCame up in a
discussion recently, and well our little group is unsure about it.

Would a Fighter Screen, screening a Cloaked Warship, be cloaked as well?
  or
does the field stop at the ship hull?

DOCAGREN

Just a Lurker here on the Digest, But maybe I have a good idea or 2..
:-)

**************************************
 Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour

From: Eric Foley <stiltman@t...>

Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:37:23 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT} Cloaked ships & Fighters

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l

From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>

Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:39:41 -0500

Subject: Re: [GZG] [FT} Cloaked ships & Fighters

I find it easily going both ways. Cloaked is invisible, but preplotted
movement could mean planned, and the fighters could just keep up with the
plot. Non-cloaked screening fighters would be a dead giveaway for the
ship's location, of course.

Other hand, if fighters included in cloak, then they are invisible, but also
unable to do anything other than follow the plot until decloaked.

Or should a plotted 'break away from cloak' be allowed?

Other effects still swirling about my head...

That Beast Guy

PS Anybody else planning on attending special GenCon vendor's day?

Eric wrote on 07/27/2007 05:37:23 PM:

> If the cloaking field stops at the ship's hull, I would say that the