Designed three scenarios that I have played only solo.Would there be any
interest from folks to check them out if I posted them onto my website? Let me
know and I can provide descriptions of them here.Please note I have
designed some ships but have no BPV/CPV values or Mass values assigned
to them (play solo so dont worry about the points issues,just design what I
like.)
Thanks,
I love looking at scenerios; I'm very BAD about AAR and critiques. *queue
Chris*
However, even if you never hear from me again, you will know you have my
gratitude. That, and $1.25...
The_Beast
Mark Drake wrote on 03/25/2007 11:21:03 AM:
> Designed three scenarios that I have played only solo.Would there be
Let
> me know and I can provide descriptions of them here.Please note I have
> them (play solo so dont worry about the points issues,just design what
I'd be interested for the GZG site, if your happy me putting them their
> -----Original Message-----
Let
> me know and I can provide descriptions of them here.Please note I have
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lOn 3/25/07, Mark &
> Staci Drake <markandstaci@charter.net> wrote:
Yes, please.
Mk
You bet, post them. If they look good, I'll force them on my players...
Mike
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Mark & Staci Drake wrote:
> Designed three scenarios that I have played only solo.Would there be
> designed some ships but have no BPV/CPV values or Mass values assigned
Or I could place them in the FTJava game system.
> Mike Stanczyk wrote:
> the points issues,just design what I like.)
Will finish them up on my week off and submit them for approval...thanks.
MD
> I love looking at scenerios; I'm very BAD about AAR and critiques.
*queue Chris*
...you mean you actually play FT?
That was supposed to be an opening for a general rant about the lack of AAR's!
*seeth*
;->=
The_Beast
PS I did run a game about three weeks ago at the store, and introduced to a
new player. Don't want to think how long it'd been before that...
Chris wrote on 03/27/2007 08:48:31 AM:
> >I love looking at scenerios; I'm very BAD about AAR and
*ahem* And that's CUE Chris....
Otherwise, he'd have waited his turn.
The_Beast
> Me are wrote:
> I love looking at scenerios; I'm very BAD about AAR and
> *ahem* And that's CUE Chris....
Since you said you were baa'd, I assumed you were referring to the line of
Narns outside my house.
> PS I did run a game about three weeks ago at the store, and introduced
<grin>....okay, that's the START of an AAR. Kudos for that, you've already
gone farther than a lot of folks.
I'll compose a more serious rant in a bit.
Are those my cues over there?
Yes, and you'd better get them out of the cellophane before they scorch.
The_Beast
Chris on 03/27/2007 09:10:14 AM:
> >*ahem* And that's CUE Chris....
> That was supposed to be an opening for a general rant about the lack of
Okay, let's see some AARs.
Try UN, including AMTs. Grasers cost 3xMass but don't get rerolls.
Try New Israelis, with stealth.
Try Islamic Fed with Heavy Missiles. Ignore the stuff about evasion--use
endurance only for moves. Antiship weapons can shoot at missiles but treat
them as being at double range; you have to assign a FCS to each
missile. Try it with PDS and beams hitting on 5-6.