From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 15:54:43 +0100
Subject: [GZG] Fighter identification
Hi all, Can anybody identify the following fighter? http://dev.glendale.org.uk/gallery/v/wargaming/misc/fighter.jpg.html It'll be an 'old style' design, I had assumed NSL (it looks closest to a Wespe according to the catalogue, but doesn't have a tail fin) but I may well be wrong. Thanks.
From: James Moore <jmooreou@g...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 11:10:38 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
_______________________________________________ Gzg-l mailing list Gzg-l@mail.csua.berkeley.edu http://mail.csua.berkeley.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/gzg-lI think that's a unsc hammer class fighter. > On May 16, 2010 10:54 AM, "Samuel Penn" <sam@glendale.org.uk> wrote: Hi all, Can anybody identify the following fighter? http://dev.glendale.org.uk/gallery/v/wargaming/misc/fighter.jpg.html It'll be an 'old style' design, I had assumed NSL (it looks closest to a Wespe according to the catalogue, but doesn't have a tail fin) but I may well be wrong. Thanks.
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 16:24:25 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
> On Sunday 16 May 2010 16:10:38 James Moore wrote: My copy of the catalogue lists Dauntless and Defender class fighters for UNSC, no Hammer class. UNSC aren't listed in the store anymore either. I didn't think I'd bought any UNSC fighters, but it's possible. I do tend to buy random stuff... > On May 16, 2010 10:54 AM, "Samuel Penn" <sam@glendale.org.uk> wrote:
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 10:27:50 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
That had been available prior to UNSC having a fleet, right? It's same as the not-Hammerhead as I recall it, though I don't think I ever got any. The_Beast James Moore on 05/16/2010 10:10:38 AM: > I think that's a unsc hammer class fighter. > On May 16, 2010 10:54 AM, "Samuel Penn":
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 10:31:57 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
No picture, but UNCS Hammer class fighters are listed at Eureka. http://eurekamin.com.au/product_info.php?products_id=3506 The_Beast Samuel Penn wrote on 05/16/2010 10:24:25 AM: > On Sunday 16 May 2010 16:10:38 James Moore wrote:
From: Jim Bell <jn.bell@s...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 11:43:28 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
It is the GF 010 UNSC "Hammer" class atmosphere capable fighter. Released prior to the UNSC fleet but at the same time as GF 012 both of which were not "Space Above and Beyond" ships. > 5/16/2010 11:24 AM, Samuel Penn wrote:
From: Dean Gundberg <dean.gundberg@n...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 10:45:57 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
It is the UNSC Hammer but from the GF range (GF-010) not from the UNSC Fleet. Full name is "UNSC Hammer class atmosphere-capable Fighters" Dean Gundberg Starship Combat News The latest information on Space Games and Miniatures http://www.star-ranger.com dean@star-ranger.com > On Sunday 16 May 2010 16:10:38 James Moore wrote:
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 16:55:06 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
> On Sunday 16 May 2010 16:45:57 Star Ranger wrote: That makes more sense now in terms of my buying habits. And I've found pictures of them under 'Merchants and Misc' in the catalogue. Thanks to everyone who helped.
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 16:59:25 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
> It is the UNSC Hammer but from the GF range (GF-010) not from the UNSC Yep, Dean and others have got it spot-on; it is GF-010, and is still currently in production. It was one of a selection of assorted fighter types released in the GF range because they didn't really fit with any of the actual FT fleets available at the time - when I later did the full UNSC fleet, I did them two new fighter types (FT1101 and 1121), but never got round to re-naming the old GF ones. Just to remind everyone, the UNSC FT fleet is NOT gone for ever - just on hiatus pending new moulds being made when I get the time, hopefully sometime over this summer (ditto for the Japanese). Jon (GZG) > Starship Combat News wrote: > > http://dev.glendale.org.uk/gallery/v/wargaming/misc/fighter.jpg.html > >
From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 12:02:23 -0500
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
Yeah, well, if I weren't at work during major hardware upgrades and network issues, I'm sure I would have gotten the whole story out, first, and not hit-and-miss Googling... Hmm... I probably shouldn't admit that, should I... Never mind. ;->= The_Beast Jon At GZG wrote on 05/16/2010 11:59:25 AM: > >It is the UNSC Hammer but from the GF range (GF-010) not from the
From: Samuel Penn <sam@b...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 18:46:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
> On Sunday 16 May 2010 17:59:25 Ground Zero Games wrote: I don't think I need any more, I've just started re-basing my fighters, and came across them in my big-bag-of-fighters, not knowing which fleet they belonged to. Are the GF-019 (Raider fighters) based on the Raiders from B5? A pic of them seems to be missing from the catalogue page which lists them.
From: Ground Zero Games <jon@g...>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 19:51:46 +0000
Subject: Re: [GZG] Fighter identification
> On Sunday 16 May 2010 17:59:25 Ground Zero Games wrote: Yes, they are a simple triangular design, very reminiscent of that of which you speak.... ;-) Jon (GZG) > --