From: Barclay, Tom <tomb@b...>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:29:51 -0400
Subject: [GZG-ECC IV] - Excercise: Northern Crown
Herein is outlined the "justifier" style bumpf for the scenario myself and Carlos will be running (urban style FMA Skirmish with the LosT extensions) It's a wee bit of a read http://fox.nstn.ca/~kaladorn/Gaming/Trouble.htm Jon, I'll let you know our table reqs once I talk it over with Los again.:)
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 23:20:55 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG-ECC IV] - Excercise: Northern Crown
Dibs on a Confederate slot. > Herein is outlined the "justifier" style bumpf for the scenario
From: Los <los@c...>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 10:58:29 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG-ECC IV] - Excercise: Northern Crown
Are you saying there are also going to be sub team rivalries like North vs South and French Canadians vs Normal Canadians? Los <grin> > At 11:20 PM 8/2/00 -0400, you wrote:
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 12:22:19 -0400
Subject: Re: [GZG-ECC IV] - Excercise: Northern Crown
If I were going to reply to this, I'd say that the Damyankees, the Maple Leafs and the Kaybeckers may all be _sub_ teams as you say, but Johnny Reb's team will be a _super_ team instead. However, since some poor pitiful benighted souls on this list haven't yet escaped from north of the Mason Dixon line, I'll refrain from saying anything. [quoted original message omitted]