From: Doug Evans <devans@n...>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 10:49:44 -0600
Subject: [GZG] Demonstrating Subject change to Remote Sensor Drone - was Re: [GZG] ping
Are there RSD's in either gropos rule set? Possibilities to shoot down? Availability of harsh language? The_Beast Roger wrote on 02/01/2007 10:42:55 AM: > Shoot the #$%^ thing down! > On 2/1/07, laserlight@verizon.net < laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:19:19 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Demonstrating Subject change to Remote Sensor Drone - was Re: [GZG] ping
> Are there RSD's in either gropos rule set? Possibilities to shoot down? SG2 has remote-controlled aerial sensor platforms, although the only time I've actually seen the rule used is last Cheese Game, when Darth Squidious used the Force to see through the eyes of various sheep. > Availability of harsh language?
From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:21:39 -0600 (CST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Demonstrating Subject change to Remote Sensor Drone - was Re: [GZG] ping
> Availability of harsh language? Quote from last ECC's Friday night DS3 game, from a Hu'Man complaining abouty the ineffectiveness of his guns: "Harsh language. Harsh language would at least have a chance of making them go Ro'Kah."
From: Charles Lee <xarcht@y...>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 09:36:07 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [GZG] Demonstrating Subject change to Remote Sensor Drone - was Re: [GZG] ping
Good luck. As radars get better so does small size stealth technologies. No pilot saves lots of weight and volume. > --- Doug Evans <devans@nebraska.edu> wrote: > Are there RSD's in either gropos rule set? http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l > [quoted text omitted]