[GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

6 posts ยท Mar 29 2006 to Mar 30 2006

From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:34:16 -0500

Subject: [GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

The dates for ECC X have been updated.

We'll be meeting on February 16-18, 2007 in Lancaster, PA.  These dates
are one week earlier than originally scheduled.

From: John K Lerchey <lerchey@a...>

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:08:28 -0500

Subject: Re: [GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

A week earlier!?

I can barely get my games ready in time as it is!;)

<just kidding>

J

--On Wednesday, March 29, 2006 6:34 PM -0500 Jon Davis
> <davisje@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

> The dates for ECC X have been updated.

From: Jon Davis <davisje@n...>

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:16:00 -0500

Subject: Re: [GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

That's why I'm giving you 47 weeks notice! LOL

> John K. Lerchey wrote:

> A week earlier!?

From: VinsFullThrust@a...

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:26:06 EST

Subject: Re: [GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l
In a message dated 3/29/2006 9:16:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> davisje@nycap.rr.com writes:

That's why I'm giving you 47 weeks notice! LOL

> John K. Lerchey wrote:

> A week earlier!?

I am already test playing a game I am planing, and it includes the infamous
SaVaksu   -=evilly grins=-

V

From: Martin Connell <mxconnell@o...>

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:32:27 -0500

Subject: Re: [GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

> "Jon Davis" wrote:

Yes, but there is the entire MS Project schedule to revise, updated budgets,
and a whole host of down stream vendors to be informed and new commitments
agreed to!

This is going to mean a lot of overtime, and probably cost overages, IT AIN'T
GOING TO BE PRETTY!.

From: Roger Books <books@m...>

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:05:32 -0500

Subject: Re: [GZG] [CON] ECC X News update

Did you ever see a post you wished you didn't understand?

Roger

> On 3/29/06, martin connell <mxconnell@optonline.net> wrote:
3/28/2006
> _______________________________________________