[GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

13 posts ยท Oct 6 2006 to Oct 7 2006

From: Robertson, Brendan <Brendan.Robertson@d...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 17:07:23 +1000

Subject: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

So much for short and simple campaign.

***
Col Atkinson let his reserve through the streets to try and flank the
firefight raging around his tanks. A scratch unit of his own IFV, two mobile
Dragoon IFVs and a recently repaired light AFV. With a quick reorganisation of
his infantry and he had almost a full platoon. "Lt Rider; SITREP." A very
frazzled sergeant responded instead "Lt Rider is down sir, Sgt Elvar here.
We've got smoke everywhere, but it appears that enemy infantry are decamping
to the west. We're busy with the PA forces..." <sounds of secondary explosions
and burning plasma> "...but they're having trouble getting through the armour.
APFC exhausted and rapidly losing mobility, so not going to be able to chase."
"Affirmative, help is on the way. Try and keep the PA on you, ignore the
infantry. We'll be there in two, repeat two minutes."

A fireball to the north indicated the possible flow of battle, except C&C
still had the location static. Sweeping around the last corner,
smoke was clearly visible and blocking effective line-of-sight to the
combatants.   Two bounding suits of PA immediately drew fire as they
emerged from the smoke, and then the sudden deceleration as infantry squads
dismounted. Smoke swirled and the balance shifted in favour of the fresh
troops. Small firefights between PA and infantry supported by AFVs and the
surviving tanks quickly began to clear. One last flurry of fire from a trapped
Hooligan missile team and then nothing moved.

As the debris was cleared and casualties treated, it became apparent that both
sides had suffered heavily in the engagement. Hudak's troops had pulled out
for the moment but the cost of taking the town had been high.
 As
soon as everything was secure, it would be time to go back on the offensive
with the entire sector hanging in the balance.

More to come later (Officers; I need new orders heading into the evening.
John, intel is as expected, no contact yet. Laserlight, let me know how you
want to handle the fallback. Both of you know there's a recon chessgame
somewhere on the road between Q & K).

***
Confirmed casualties to date (dead or wounded):

Hudak's Hooligans: HQ: 5 troopers First Platoon: 19 troopers
Second Platoon: 12 troopers + GMS/L
Third Platoon: not engaged
Support Platoon: 2 x GMS/L SUV (1 destroyed, 1 damaged), 1 x Mortar SUV
Assault Platoon: 14 PA (including 1 plasma gunner) Tank Platoon: not engaged
Logistics Platoon: not engaged

Atkinson's Arrows: HQ: 2 troopers Dragoons: 2 IFVs (1 destroyed, 1 damaged), 1
IFV damaged and repaired, 13 troopers Heavy "Lance" Troop: 3 light tanks (1
destroyed, 1 mission killed, 1 damaged) Light "Sabre" Troop: 1 AFV destroyed,
1 trooper Mortar Section: no casualties. Support services: not engaged.

Brendan 'Neath Southern Skies
http://home.pacific.net.au/~southernsk/

IMPORTANT 1. Before opening any attachments, please check for viruses.
2. This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient,
please contact the sender and delete all copies of this email.
3. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the sender and are
not a statement of Australian Government Policy unless otherwise stated. 4.
Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous publications
and DVA does not consent to the receipt of commercial electronic messages.
5. Please go to http://www.dva.gov.au/feedback.htm#sub to unsubscribe
emails

of this type from DVA. 6. Finally, please do not remove this notice.

From: Michael Brown <mwbrown@s...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 06:50:07 -0600

Subject: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Sounds like SHORT is the operative word. IIRC 40% losses to a unit will
make it combat ineffective.  These are Company (@100-150 troopers) size
units, right? Hudak might want to consider activating his bond, but Atkinson
might want to "re-group" too.

Michael Brown mwsaber6@msn.com

[quoted original message omitted]

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 08:11:21 -0500 (CDT)

Subject: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> From: Michael Brown
size units, right? Hudak might want to consider activating his bond, but
Atkinson might want to "re-group" too.

I'm assuming that half or more of my "dead and wounded" will return to
duty at some point--maybe tomorrow, maybe after the campaign finishes.

And in fact, from a financial point of view, the Arrows have lost considerably
more than the Hooligans have.

> Michael Brown

> 4. Electronic addresses published in this email are not conspicuous

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:11:02 +0300

Subject: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On 10/6/06, laserlight@verizon.net <laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:
size units, right? Hudak might want to consider activating his bond, but
Atkinson might want to "re-group" too.
> I'm assuming that half or more of my "dead and wounded" will return to

You think the contract doesn't cover that?

Condittiere in 13th century Italy were smart enough to write replacement
horses into their contracts. So do I.

From: Hudak, Michael <mihudak@s...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:15:17 -0400

Subject: RE: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On 10/6/06, laserlight@verizon.net <laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:

I don't know about the contracts for this engagement, but if history is

From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 11:17:34 -0500

Subject: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

You think the contract doesn't cover that?

Condittiere in 13th century Italy were smart enough to write replacement
horses into their contracts. So do I.

***And I thought you took nothing from us Papists...)

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 11:37:26 -0500 (CDT)

Subject: Re: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

I said:
> And in fact, from a financial point of view, the Arrows have lost

John said:
> You think the contract doesn't cover that?

You're hired by the NAC, not a desperate Italian city. The purchasing
authority is not going to give you a blank check for unlimited replacement
equipment. There's a reason the condottiere specialized in maneuvering, not
pitched battles.

In any event, I'm pretty sure I have a better deal. I could replace half my
company with the payment just for the first day's fighting.

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:40:21 +0300

Subject: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On 10/6/06, Don M <dmaddox1@hot.rr.com> wrote:

Yes, but unlike Papists, I actually honor my contracts, rather than attempting
to renegotiate payscales in the midst of a Turkish attack.

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:44:25 +0300

Subject: Re: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On 10/6/06, laserlight@verizon.net <laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:

If you get out of Dodge RFSN, which would necessitate leaving behind most of
your wounded, which as I have posession of the field, I have in my aid
station.

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:03:54 -0500 (CDT)

Subject: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> If you get out of Dodge RFSN, which would necessitate leaving behind

You seem to be assuming that we casually leave our wounded on the field, per
normal practice back in the 1300's. Does your unit still practice that?

You have two other assumptions there which are wrong, but I'll let you find
out those on your own.

From: Don M <dmaddox1@h...>

Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:16:59 -0500

Subject: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

Yes, but unlike Papists, I actually honor my contracts, rather than attempting
to renegotiate payscales in the midst of a Turkish attack.

John

A further indication of your moral decline and lack of understanding in
the capitalist system ;-P

From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@y...>

Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 06:05:17 +0300

Subject: Re: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On 10/6/06, laserlight@verizon.net <laserlight@verizon.net> wrote:

> There's a reason the condottiere specialized in maneuvering, not

There's a limit to the clever maneuvering you can do when outnumbered 2:1,
expected to attack and take two towns, and given an intelligence briefing that
is downright criminally negligent, which is something that is going to be
discussed in great detail during the contract
re-negotiation phase after this mission.

From: Laserlight <laserlight@q...>

Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:30:30 -0500 (CDT)

Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: [GZG] [brushfire]day2.5-daycycle-part2 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

> On 10/6/06, laserlight@verizon.net

> From: John Atkinson <johnmatkinson@gmail.com>

Isn't that when clever maneuvering would be most necessary?
_______________________________________________
Gzg-l mailing list
Gzg-l@lists.csua.berkeley.edu
http://lists.csua.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gzg-l